Packaging and text in AI/CGI scenes: artwork handover and acceptance

Short answer. Accurate packaging starts with approved artwork for a specific product. A film also needs a surface map, mandatory wording, a mapping to product variants and clear expectations for reading in the scene. Approval happens twice: first for the assembled appearance, then for the package throughout movement and in every delivered version. One attractive still does not complete that task.

This guide helps a brand team give a designer and production supplier requirements they can inspect. The outputs are an artwork package and an acceptance register. The 3D packshot service describes the broader format; the focus here is packaging and wording rather than a general account of geometry, lighting or production costs.

1. Identify the package the viewer should see

Start with the product, variant, size or volume, packaging language and design revision. Together, these identify the subject of the assignment. A brand name is insufficient when the archive contains several similar boxes and an updated design.

State whether the image represents a marketed package, a proposed future design or a graphic concept. A marketed item needs an approved product source. A concept needs a decision owner who can approve a design that may not yet exist. Those roles should not be mixed silently in a reference folder.

A scene may require recognisable packaging without asking viewers to read small rear-panel wording. That does not authorise replacing it with arbitrary characters. Distinguish correct content from intended readability. Text can be accurate in the artwork without being a reading task in every shot.

2. Give each requirement an authoritative source

Design artwork governs graphics. The product list governs the variant. Approved wording governs content. An assembly reference governs placement. Each source should have an explicit role.

If a photograph shows an old label while the design file contains a new one, the supplier should not choose the more attractive version. The coordinator records the conflict and obtains a product-owner decision. Until then, the photograph remains reference material rather than an authoritative instruction.

Identify the source for each surface. Front, side, lid and rear panels may not be updated together. A general new packaging label can hide those differences. Use a surface table containing versions and approval states.

3. Build a reviewable artwork package

The proposed package contains working files, viewing copies and an index. The working file supports production, the viewing copy supports comparison and the index explains membership. Agree the actual file formats with the receiving team from the available originals.

Do not supply only an attractive brand presentation if exact artwork exists elsewhere. Its mock-up may be reduced or outdated. Provide the relevant artwork and identify what has been approved.

Front artwork. Required identification: Product, language and revision. Decision owner: Brand team.

Side and rear panels. Required identification: Surface name and orientation. Decision owner: Packaging designer.

Wording list. Required identification: Exact spelling and mandatory line breaks. Decision owner: Content owner.

Variant map. Required identification: Artwork associated with each SKU. Decision owner: Product owner.

Assembly reference. Required identification: Panel placement on the object. Decision owner: Packaging designer.

Open-item list. Required identification: Question, owner and response date. Decision owner: Coordinator.

Viewing and working copies should describe the same revision. If a designer corrects a word after exporting the preview, update both or report the discrepancy. Otherwise, the reviewer may carefully compare against an obsolete reference.

4. A completed artwork index

Consider a hypothetical tea range with two flavours, Russian packaging and an English advertising version. The example illustrates planning rather than a client outcome.

PK-A-RU-05. Source: Flavour A, Russian, revision 05. Use: All A box surfaces. Boundary: Previous revision superseded.

PK-B-RU-03. Source: Flavour B, Russian, revision 03. Use: All B box surfaces. Boundary: Name and illustration differ.

TXT-EN-02. Source: English advertising wording. Use: Overlay titles. Boundary: Does not replace box wording.

MAP-01. Source: Panel placement map. Use: Assembly of both variants. Boundary: Front orientation marked.

OPEN-01. Source: Question about B rear panel. Use: Turning shot. Boundary: Answer needed before turn approval.

This exposes a useful distinction: an English advertisement does not necessarily depict English physical packaging. If the marketed item has Russian wording, translating the label automatically may depict a different item.

The transfer message should identify changes since the previous delivery. Checking three named replacements is easier than reconstructing an entire archive from memory.

5. Separate product wording from screen graphics

A product label belongs to the package. An advertising title belongs to the film composition. Translating or enlarging a title does not authorise a change to the label. Keep these as separate review items.

Assign a task to each text element: read it exactly, recognise the name, distinguish variants or preserve its correct appearance without requiring reading. A flavour name may support choice; a small rear panel may simply belong to an accurate depiction.

If the audience must read a phrase, identify the scene and interval where that should happen. Text is visible is insufficient: it might appear briefly, at an angle or beneath a reflection. Define the intended viewing outcome.

6. Describe turning and surface exposure

A camera may begin on the front and reveal a side panel. Both surfaces and their relationship then need inspection. Check panel order, the top of the package and the orientation of wording after the turn.

Request control views at the start, when a new surface becomes visible and at the end. They can reveal a correct front attached to an incorrect side. More complex movement needs additional checkpoints selected from the actual action.

If the rear is unapproved, choose among obtaining the artwork, restricting the turn or changing the scene. Do not assume an unknown surface will remain unnoticeable without watching the motion. Preserve any camera restriction in the assignment.

7. Separate environmental exploration from product control

Backgrounds, atmosphere and decoration may remain open to creative exploration. Approved packaging needs its own acceptance basis. Ask the supplier which part of the proposed treatment preserves the artwork and which part is generated or transformed with the scene.

The answer need not be the same production method for every project. A controlled CGI package, a prepared graphic element or another approach may be appropriate. Evaluate the approach by whether it preserves required features during the intended action.

If letters or illustrations change when the environment is added, direct the comment at that product requirement. A general request to improve quality may produce a different background while leaving the critical defect unresolved.

8. Inspect the assembled view before movement

At the first review, set aside pacing and music. Compare the assembled package with the control artwork: product name, variant, panel direction, important marks and graphic placement.

Use two viewing scales. A close region helps locate a character or positioning error. The complete frame shows whether the wording performs its role in the composition. Enlarging a detail does not establish readability in the intended small presentation.

Record a specific decision: content and placement from PK-A-RU-05 approved in the control view; readability during movement not yet reviewed. This permits the next activity without giving the inspection a broader meaning than it has.

9. Follow the package throughout its visible interval

Motion review needs sequential viewing rather than unrelated stills. Watch at ordinary playback speed first, then inspect suspicious areas frame by frame. This is a proposed review procedure, not a guarantee that every possible defect will be detected.

Mark the initial appearance of text, its clearest moment, a strong turn, an obstruction and its exit. Each has a different concern. Wording may be correct centrally and change near a transition or edge.

A useful comment identifies version, interval, surface and expected result. For example: in v06 during the turn after the front view, flavour A changes into another character sequence; preserve PK-A-RU-05 throughout the visible interval.

10. A completed packaging acceptance register

Continue the tea example. The timestamps below identify seconds in a particular review version, not prescribed industry durations.

P01. Version and interval: v06, 00:02–00:04. Observation: A box carries flavour B wording. Decision: Apply PK-A-RU-05. Closure check: Check name and illustration.

P02. Version and interval: v06, 00:05–00:07. Observation: Side panel is upside down. Decision: Correct orientation using MAP-01. Closure check: Review complete turn.

P03. Version and interval: v06, 00:09–00:11. Observation: English title covers product name. Decision: Recompose the title. Closure check: Check both in the full frame.

P04. Version and interval: v06, ending. Observation: Front artwork agrees. Decision: Content accepted. Closure check: Recheck if artwork changes.

The final row illustrates partial acceptance. It does not close the whole film. A later artwork revision may require another comparison even in a previously accepted shot.

Add an owner and response date. With many variants, a SKU filter helps prevent a correction for box A from being applied indiscriminately across the range.

11. Classify packaging errors

Wrong product variant. The spelling can be correct while belonging to another flavour or volume. Start by checking the artwork identifier against the product map.

Wrong character or word. Identify the location and link the approved line. Retyping it in every message creates another opportunity for inconsistency.

Wrong surface. Front graphics may appear on a side, mirrored or upside down. Supply the placement map and control view rather than an ambiguous instruction to turn it around.

A defect during movement. Record the interval and changing feature. One repaired frame does not establish that the full interval is corrected.

Accurate but unreadable text. This concerns composition, movement or exposure time. The solution should improve the reading conditions while retaining approved content.

12. Treat languages as separate decisions

For each output, specify packaging language, overlay language and voice language. They may match or differ. The table prevents translation of an advertising message from accidentally changing a product asset.

Appoint a translation owner and provide a final approved line. The supplier should not choose between competing versions scattered through messages. If the translated wording needs more space, approve a revised composition. Shortening it to fit requires content approval.

Review more than the replaced words. A new title may obstruct the product or collide with another graphic. Watch the complete language version in its intended format even when product movement is unchanged.

13. Handle packaging updates after approval

A new revision needs a change list: name, illustration, mark placement or a particular panel. Identify which earlier files it replaces and which film version should begin using it.

The production team marks affected scenes and outputs. The coordinator checks that implementation is complete: a new front in a close-up should not coexist accidentally with an old front in the closing group shot.

If only one SKU changes, the others do not automatically require rebuilding. Their shared scene still needs review after the replacement. Acceptance concerns the assembled output where the objects interact within one composition.

14. Resolve conflicts between visual impact and accuracy

A strong reflection may hide a name; an expressive angle may make the package unrecognisable; decoration may appear to be part of the product. Return to the purpose of the scene. If it sells a particular variant, recognising that variant is a condition of the creative treatment.

Compare two responses to the same problem: retain the atmosphere with a different product position, or retain the angle with a changed light emphasis. Decide against the message rather than general preference for an effect.

If an abstract opening is deliberate, provide a separate clear recognition moment. Record where it occurs. The opening then avoids the conflicting demand to be both abstract and fully informative.

15. Review each actual output

A vertical composition, short edit and wide master may present the package differently. Identify the recognition moment and mandatory wording for each file.

Do not transfer approval automatically after cropping or re-editing. A shortened front view may alter readability. A relocated title may cover a previously clear area. Inspect the actual output rather than only its shared source.

Record filename, SKU, packaging language, title language, approved artwork identifiers and unresolved questions. This compact output record helps later teams select the correct version without reconstructing the entire conversation.

16. Write an explicit acceptance note

A useful note names the decisions: in v08, A and B packaging agree with the listed artwork; turns reviewed throughout visible intervals; English title accepted in the wide version; vertical ending still requires an obstruction check.

The note allows work on the accepted portion while retaining the open question. Generally looks good does not provide that separation. Approval of text by one participant should not be broadened into approval of every product property.

Store the accepted version, register and artwork together. When a new flavour or design arrives, this record helps establish what may genuinely be reused.

17. Organise the buyer's review

First check the association between product and artwork. Then check wording. Finally consolidate readability and composition issues. This suggested sequence avoids spending time discussing the exposure of an incorrect label.

Send every reviewer the same version and name the current decision. For example, content and panel orientation are being reviewed while colour treatment follows separately. Reviewers can focus without important comments becoming lost among general impressions.

Keep observations outside the current stage too, with a status showing when they will be addressed. Asking people to remember and resubmit them later risks losing useful information.

Before returning comments, reconcile conflicting spellings against the authoritative source. Obtain one approved line rather than forwarding two alternatives as successive corrections. Retain the question history and final decision.

18. Three decisions when artwork is incomplete

Only the front label exists. Start with a front-facing test, request the other panels or restrict the turn. Choose according to whether the audience needs to understand package volume.

New graphics exist without an assembly reference. Confirm their placement on the shape using a simple labelled control view. Advertising atmosphere can wait until the package is assembled correctly.

Several similar variants have no identifiers. Create a mapping between product name, image, revision and intended scene before producing the series. Similar filenames are an unreliable substitute for this decision.

Each branch should end with an approved scene, missing-data list or agreed change of movement. This is more actionable than a general statement that there are insufficient materials.

Before extending the chosen solution across a range, confirm what is genuinely shared. Identical box shape does not make wording and illustrations interchangeable. Each new artwork still requires content review even when panel placement repeats.

19. Prepare a focused production request

For AI video production, supply the artwork index, surface map, mandatory wording and movement description. Mark where an exact product must remain controlled within a generated environment.

For a controlled all-round package presentation, discuss CGI product video. Attach the most demanding artwork to the brief and identify the scene where accuracy matters most. That gives a visual test a concrete purpose and the eventual series a workable acceptance procedure.

Related planning guides

From product photos to an AI/CGI video sequence. How to assess supplied product photographs, define permitted movement and choose a workable digital-video scope without inventing unseen product details.

AI, CGI and 3D: choosing the production method